Meritshot
Legal

Tests & Examination Policy

How you are assessed, what happens if you miss a test, and the academic integrity rules that apply.

All assessments are designed to measure both theoretical understanding and practical implementation capability. Students are expected to approach every evaluation with academic integrity, full preparation, and strict adherence to the rules outlined in this section.

2.1 Assessment Structure

Students will undergo multiple forms of evaluation throughout the program. The assessment framework includes the following components:

  • Module tests — conducted at the conclusion of each module to evaluate conceptual understanding.
  • Assignments — regular tasks designed to reinforce classroom learning through applied practice.
  • Practical assessments — hands-on evaluations involving real tools, datasets, or problem scenarios.
  • Case studies — analytical exercises based on real-world industry situations relevant to the program domain.
  • Quizzes — short-format evaluations conducted during or between sessions to check ongoing comprehension.
  • Final examinations — comprehensive end-of-program evaluations covering all major curriculum areas.
  • Project evaluations — structured reviews of individual or group projects by mentors or an expert panel.
  • Viva or oral assessments — where applicable, students may be required to verbally explain and defend their project work or technical knowledge before a review panel.

2.2 Mandatory Test Participation

Participation in all tests and assessments is mandatory unless the student has received prior written exemption from the academic team. The following rules apply:

  • All tests and assessments are compulsory unless explicitly marked as optional in the academic schedule.
  • Students must attempt and submit all assessments within the stipulated deadline. Late or missed attempts without prior approval will be treated as non-submissions and marked zero.
  • Students must use only the platforms and tools designated by the institute for assessment submissions. Submissions through unauthorized channels will not be accepted.

2.3 Missing an Exam or Test

If a student fails to appear for a scheduled test or examination, the following consequences will apply depending on the circumstances:

Without Prior Information:

  • The student will receive an 'Absent' status for the respective assessment.
  • Marks will not be awarded for any missed assessment without prior approval.
  • The missed test may be treated as a failed attempt and reflected in the student's academic record.

With Valid Reason & Prior Approval:

  • A re-test may be scheduled at the discretion of the assigned trainer or academic management.
  • Valid reasons that may qualify for a re-test consideration include medical emergencies (supported by a registered medical practitioner's certificate), family emergencies with appropriate communication, and verifiable technical failures with documented proof.
  • Approval for a re-test is not automatic and is subject to case-by-case review by the academic team.
  • Re-test requests must be raised in writing (via email or the LMS grievance portal) within 48 hours of the missed assessment.

2.4 Re-Test Policy

The following conditions govern all re-test requests and approvals:

  • Re-tests are not guaranteed for every missed or failed assessment. They are provided only in exceptional and documented circumstances.
  • Re-tests will be scheduled only upon formal approval from the trainer or academic management team.
  • Additional evaluation conditions — such as modified test formats or stricter submission requirements — may apply to re-tests at the discretion of the faculty.
  • Each student is permitted a maximum of one re-test opportunity per module, subject to management approval. No further re-tests will be granted for the same module under any circumstances.

2.5 Passing Criteria

Achieving minimum qualifying marks is a prerequisite for progression through the program. Students may be required to meet passing thresholds in order to:

  • Advance to higher or more advanced modules within the curriculum.
  • Participate in live industry projects and external collaborations.
  • Be declared placement-eligible and access placement assistance services.
  • Qualify for the program completion certificate as detailed in Section 5.

Note: Minimum qualifying marks for each assessment will be communicated at the start of the respective module. Students who fail to meet these thresholds may be required to reappear or resubmit before progressing.


2.6 Academic Integrity Policy

Meritshot maintains a zero-tolerance policy on academic dishonesty. The following activities are strictly prohibited across all assessments, tests, and project submissions:

  • Cheating during tests — use of unauthorized materials, devices, notes, or human assistance during any assessment.
  • Copying assignments or projects from other students or external sources without attribution.
  • Using unauthorized resources, books, or electronic devices during closed-book examinations.
  • Sharing answers, solutions, or assessment content with other students during or after an evaluation.
  • Impersonation — allowing another person to appear for or complete an assessment on one's behalf, or doing the same for another student.
  • Manipulation or tampering of assessment platforms, scores, or submission records.

Violation of academic integrity rules may result in one or more of the following consequences, depending on the severity of the breach:

  • Cancellation of marks for the affected assessment.
  • Mandatory re-submission of the compromised work under supervised conditions.
  • Suspension from future assessments for a defined period.
  • Disqualification from certification or placement support, or both, in cases of repeated or severe violations.
  • Formal reporting to law enforcement authorities in cases of identity fraud or platform manipulation.

Legal Reference: Academic dishonesty involving impersonation, identity fraud, or tampering with digital assessment systems may attract liability under the Information Technology Act, 2000 (Sections 43, 65, and 66) and the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The institute reserves the right to pursue legal remedies in cases of confirmed fraud.